AI-driven attacks put pressure on your security controls to adapt quickly to new threats.
Hacktica shows how your current policy protects your applications against attacks and helps you identify what to improve.
Services and use cases

Build Adaptive Mitigations
Shields UP !

Web Application Threats:
- Common Attack Vectors (CAV)
- Automated Traffic Threats (ATT)
- Bots and Botnets
- Attack Modus Operandi (AMO)
Security Evaluations Types
Know Your Active Protection
Understand which protections are enabled, what they detect, and what they block. Know your mitigation arsenal and how it maps to attacks against your applications.
Optimize Policy Management
Focus on relevant protections and reduce time spent investigating unknown coverage. Know which controls to enable, tune, or validate—and which signature updates are relevant to your application.
Prepare for the Next Vulnerability
Use tested attack coverage to estimate what your current policy may detect or block when a new vulnerability appears. Identify where additional testing or mitigation is needed.
Validate Protection Against New CVEs
Test relevant signatures and mitigation controls as new CVEs emerge. Confirm whether your deployed policy detects or blocks the tested exploit attempts.

- Web application
- WAF
- Bot manager
Key Value Points
WAF Assessment Types
Apply Improvements and Measure Results
Strengthen Defense in Depth
Map compensating detection and prevention measures to the attack vectors where your current protection falls short.
Apply Positive Security
Define allowed inputs and behavior at sensitive application entry points to reduce opportunities for exploitation.
Improve SIEM Visibility
Detections can provide value even when they are not configured to block. Use relevant controls in log mode to feed your SIEM and support investigation and response.
Verify Policy Changes
Retest after changes to confirm that coverage improves and check that legitimate application traffic still works as expected.
Parser
-
Web/ API parsing
-
Entity coverage
-
RFC validations
All Deployment Models
-
SaaS-Based WAF Services
-
On-Premise Appliances WAF
-
Virtual WAF Environments
-
Cloud-Native WAF Platforms
Detections
-
Signature
-
Anomaly
-
Restrictions
- Client Interrogation
All WAF Types
-
IDS/IPS HTTP traffic
-
WAF – Traditional
-
WAF – Next-Gen
- App Security Controller
Preventions
-
Blocking types
-
logging capabilities
- Rate limiting
- Retaliation
All Bot Managers
- Bot Management
- API / Application Bot Protection
- Scrubbing Centers
- Client interrogation components
Security Controls Assessment (SCA)
Purpose: Evaluate WAF’s ability to detect and mitigate known attack techniques.
Tests Include:
-
Signature effectiveness (XSS, SQLi, RCE, etc.)
-
Custom payload detection
-
Evasion technique handling
-
Entity-level protection (parameters, headers)
-
Policy tuning gaps
Outcome: Risk Mitigation Score (RMS) for control coverage.
Bot Protection Assessment
Purpose: Evaluate how WAF handles automated threats.
Tests Include:
-
OWASP Automated Threats (carding, scraping, credential stuffing)
-
Bot client simulation (headless browsers, replay tools)
-
CAPTCHA and JS challenge handling
Outcome: Bot defense score and bypass feasibility.
Policy Configuration Analysis
Purpose: Validate WAF policy logic and alignment to application behavior.
Tests Include:
-
Policy enforcement review
-
Positive security model checks
-
Custom rules review (regex, IP, Geo)
Outcome: Policy quality score and hardening recommendations.
Custom Use Case Simulation
Purpose: Validate WAF in real-world incident scenarios.
Tests Include:
-
Simulated red team campaigns
-
Attack chain testing (multi-step exploit)
-
Application-specific threat modeling
Outcome: Application-aware mitigation score.
