Research methodology is the specific procedures or techniques used to identify, select, process, and analyze information about a topic

Traditional WAF testing often stops at pass/fail — but real security demands more. That’s where Hacktica’s Security Control Evaluation Framework (SCEF) comes in.

SCEF transforms fragmented testing into a vendor-neutral, scalable, and auditable framework that goes far beyond signature checks. It empowers organizations to measure not only what their security controls block, but how they operate in real-life conditions — from incident readiness to operational usability.

With SCEF, you gain visibility into the full lifecycle of protection:

  • 🔧 Detection and enforcement quality

  • 📊 Operational usability and manageability

  • 🔄 Policy feedback loops and tuning workflows

  • 🧠 Integration with real-world SecOps and IR playbooks

  • 🚦 Support for Hacktica’s adaptive models like DSMM and AMI3A


💡 The Value of SCEF

 Vendor-Neutral – Evaluate any WAF, any architecture, in any environment
 Scalable – Apply across multiple applications, teams, and product lines
 Auditable – Track policy changes, false positives, and mitigation trends
 Realistic – Simulate attacker behavior using layered and evasive payloads
 Actionable – Drive improvements based on data, not assumptions


🚀 Secure Smarter, Not Harder

SCEF doesn’t just test your WAF — it validates your security investment, identifies blind spots, and helps your team operationalize protection. Whether you’re tuning policies, preparing for incident response, or benchmarking vendors, SCEF gives you the confidence that your controls are working when it matters most.

using Protection Profiles (A, AA, AAA) is an excellent way to bundle Security Evaluation Tiers across products like WAF, Bot Manager, Web App Network Firewall, and Scanners. This approach maps naturally to maturity levels and aligns with real-world protection claims.

Below is a suggested bundle structure for Hacktica Security Evaluations, organized by product and Protection Profile grade (A / AA / AAA).


🔐 Protection Profiles for Security Control Evaluation (SCEF)

Each grade level builds upon the previous, representing a higher standard of coverage, resilience, and operational readiness.


🛡️ Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Grade Evaluation Focus
A Basic detection coverage — confirms WAF blocks known attacks
AA Enhanced enforcement — validates evasions, meta chars, and normalization handling
AAA Adaptive WAF posture — policy tuning, feedback loops, FP management, infra mapping

Checks per grade:

  • A:

    • SQLi/XSS/CSRF detection (signature only)

    • Basic false positive handling

    • Inline or reverse proxy mode

  • AA:

    • Signature scoping by entity (headers, JSON, etc.)

    • Normalization and encoding evasions

    • Reporting per attack category

  • AAA:

    • FP justification trail (audit logs)

    • CVE updates and 0-day awareness

    • Integration with AMI3A IR workflows

    • Infrastructure discovery + signature alignment


🤖 Bot Manager

Grade Evaluation Focus
A Detect basic automation and CLI tools
AA Detect browser-based, JS-enabled bots with rate-limiting and behavioral scoring
AAA Full deception, device fingerprinting, and adaptive countermeasures

Checks per grade:

  • A:

    • Header-based bot detection

    • Basic rate limiting

    • CAPTCHA enforcement

  • AA:

    • JS challenge handling

    • Behavioral scoring models

    • Real-time threshold tuning

  • AAA:

    • Device fingerprinting

    • Bot reputation feeds and heuristics

    • Honeypot/canary interaction tests

    • IR escalation for targeted automation


🌐 Web App Network Firewall (Web APP NF)

Grade Evaluation Focus
A Baseline L3/L4 enforcement (HTTP, TCP ports, IP blocks)
AA RFC validation, malformed traffic handling, protocol integrity enforcement
AAA Threat-aware routing, inline correlation with WAF/Bot, encrypted inspection

Checks per grade:

  • A:

    • Deny-all, port filtering, geo-IP blocks

    • SSL pass-through verification

  • AA:

    • Malformed request handling

    • Rate limiting and connection flooding detection

    • Protocol compliance

  • AAA:

    • TLS/SSL termination visibility

    • Multi-path flow correlation with WAF/Bot decisions

    • Event handoff to SOC/SIEM


🔎 SAST/DAST Scanners

Grade Evaluation Focus
A Static/dynamic detection coverage on core CWEs
AA CI/CD integration, risk classification, and correlation
AAA Full SPLC alignment, contextual prioritization, and dev feedback loops

Checks per grade:

  • A:

    • Basic scan coverage (Top 10 CWEs)

    • Exportable reports

    • Manual triage needed

  • AA:

    • Pipeline-triggered scans (CI)

    • Risk scoring model (CVSS + RMS)

    • False positive suppression

  • AAA:

    • Correlation with runtime data (DAST+SAST)

    • Business context scoring

    • Integration with bug trackers, JIRA

    • SLA tracking and remediation workflow


🧠 Bundle Use Case Examples

Customer Claim Required Protection Profile
“We block all OWASP Top 10” WAF (AA), Scanner (A)
“We auto-detect bots and respond” Bot Manager (AA), WAF (AA)
“We have full adaptive protection” WAF (AAA), Bot Manager (AAA), Scanner (AAA)
“We integrate security into SDLC” Scanner (AA or AAA), WAF (AA), Infra (AA)